Things i’m thinking about
Could we use 102 vocab as part of a “placement test” for math 102?
Make a course revision for Math 70: but how to make it robust?
Re-revise Math 98/99 to reflect that 98 will be linear stuff, and 99 will be “everything else”?
Math 102 is in the works.
Given a new vision for Math 98, could the prereq for Math 107 be changed to “passed math 98 with a C or better/ placement test?” what would implications for enrollment, frequency of offering, etc. be? Can we make a more sensible list of course outcomes, that includes using excel/technology?
outcomes for Math 103 (written, processing); what about “C or better”?
outcomes for math 105 (there’s a WWU example, but not our own); what about C or better?
math 124, 125, 126: note that we do not have a placement test for math 125 or 126; we neecd course outcomes; what about C or better?
Math 151: we can do better (outcomes, description). and we can offer it sometimes.